Matter of Gwiazdowska v. Gwiazdowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Gwiazdowska v. Gwiazdowski

136 A.D.3d 618, 23 N.Y.S.3d 899

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 2016

Docket2015-00812

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 618 (Matter of Gwiazdowska v. Gwiazdowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Gwiazdowska v. Gwiazdowski, 136 A.D.3d 618, 23 N.Y.S.3d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Anne-Marie Jolly, J.), dated December 15, 2014. The order of protection directed Cezary Gwiazdowski, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until and including December 15, 2016.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the appellant’s obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal (see 425 E. 26th St. Owners Corp. v Beaton, 128 AD3d 766, 767 [2015]; Matter of Leichter-Kessler v Kessler, 117 AD3d 825, 826 [2014]). Here, the appellant failed to provide all of the transcripts from the multiday fact-finding hearing. Under the circumstances, the papers provided were inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits regarding the appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Leichter-Kessler v Kessler, 117 AD3d at 826).

Dillon, J.R, Hall, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Anne-Marie Jolly, J.), dated December 15, 2014. The order of protection directed Cezary Gwiazdowski, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until and including December 15, 2016.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the appellant’s obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal (see 425 E. 26th St. Owners Corp. v Beaton, 128 AD3d 766, 767 [2015]; Matter of Leichter-Kessler v Kessler, 117 AD3d 825, 826 [2014]). Here, the appellant failed to provide all of the transcripts from the multiday fact-finding hearing. Under the circumstances, the papers provided were inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits regarding the appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Leichter-Kessler v Kessler, 117 AD3d at 826).

Dillon, J.R, Hall, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.3d 618, 23 N.Y.S.3d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gwiazdowska-v-gwiazdowski-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack