Matter of Guillermo E.T.R. (Jazmin R.F.)

2019 NY Slip Op 5668
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 17, 2019
Docket2018-11146
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 5668 (Matter of Guillermo E.T.R. (Jazmin R.F.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Guillermo E.T.R. (Jazmin R.F.), 2019 NY Slip Op 5668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Guillermo E.T.R. (Jazmin R.F.) (2019 NY Slip Op 05668)
Matter of Guillermo E.T.R. (Jazmin R.F.)
2019 NY Slip Op 05668
Decided on July 17, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 17, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2018-11146
2018-11147
2018-11148
(Docket Nos. B-9739-17, B-9740-17, B-6738-18)

[*1]In the Matter of Guillermo E. T. R. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-respondent; Jazmin R. F. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Yeury I. R. (Anonymous), etc. SCO Family of Services, petitioner-respondent; Jazmin R. F. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)

In the Matter of Yislaily E. R. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-respondent; Jazmin R. F. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 3)


Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant.

Leventhal, Mullaney & Blinkoff, LLP, Roslyn, NY (Jeffrey Blinkoff of counsel), for petitioner-respondent (no brief filed).

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Judith Stern of counsel), attorney for the children (no brief filed).



DECISION & ORDER

In related child protective proceedings pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act, and proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the parental rights of the mother, the mother appeals from three orders of disposition (one as to each child), of the Family Court, Queens County (Carol Ann Stokinger, J.), each dated August 13, 2018. The orders of disposition, insofar as appealed from, after a dispositional hearing at which the mother failed to appear, and upon the determination of the same court in the article 10 proceedings that the mother severely abused the child Yeury I. R. and derivatively severely abused the children Yislaily E. R. and Guillermo E. T. R., terminated the mother's parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and SCO Family of Services for the purpose of adoption. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves to be relieved of her assignment to prosecute [*2]this appeal.

ORDERED that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Whittaker v Quiles, 144 AD3d 931; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Matter of Whittaker v. Quiles
2016 NY Slip Op 7664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 5668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-guillermo-etr-jazmin-rf-nyappdiv-2019.