Matter of Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp. v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of Riverhead

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp. v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of Riverhead

143 N.E.2d 352, 2 N.Y.2d 1012, 163 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1957 N.Y. LEXIS 1081

DecidedApril 12, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 143 N.E.2d 352 (Matter of Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp. v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of Riverhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp. v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of Riverhead, 143 N.E.2d 352, 2 N.Y.2d 1012, 163 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1957 N.Y. LEXIS 1081 (N.Y. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution and statutes of the United States, to wit: Respondents argued that, under the appropriate provisions of the Constitution of the United States which define the powers of the Federal Government (art. IV, cl. 3; art. I, cl. 18; and art. VI, cl. 2), the act of August 5, 1947 (ch. 493, § 6; U. S. Code, tit. 34, § 522e) and the,contract between appellant and the United States Government entered into in pursuance thereof mandated that the property involved herein be made subject to local taxation. This court held that such taxation was not mandated. [See 2 N Y 2d 500.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution and statutes of the United States, to wit: Respondents argued that, under the appropriate provisions of the Constitution of the United States which define the powers of the Federal Government (art. IV, cl. 3; art. I, cl. 18; and art. VI, cl. 2), the act of August 5, 1947 (ch. 493, § 6; U. S. Code, tit. 34, § 522e) and the,contract between appellant and the United States Government entered into in pursuance thereof mandated that the property involved herein be made subject to local taxation. This court held that such taxation was not mandated. [See 2 N Y 2d 500.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 N.E.2d 352, 2 N.Y.2d 1012, 163 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1957 N.Y. LEXIS 1081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-grumman-aircraft-engg-corp-v-bd-of-assessors-of-the-town-of-ny-1957.