Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.

171 N.E. 64, 253 N.Y. 303, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 831

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 171 N.E. 64 (Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co., 171 N.E. 64, 253 N.Y. 303, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 831 (N.Y. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

*305 Per Curiam.

Although the principal business of the employer was not a hazardous employment within the enumeration of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67, § 3), the claimant-employee was a person engaged in one of the hazardous employments so enumerated, to wit: Group 2, the Care of Buildings, and hence entitled to compensation under the provisions of section 2, subdivision 4 (Matter of Glatzl v. Stumpp, 220 N. Y. 71).

The order should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI