Matter of Grenfell (Lawyer)
63 N.E.2d 593, 294 N.Y. 610, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 754
Opinion
We agree with the Appellate Division that if the provisions of the Second Class Cities Law were to be adopted as a city charter, such provisions were required by the statute *613 to be designated specifically in the proposed local law. We pass upon no other question.
The order should be affirmed.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Medalie, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Grenfell (Lawyer), 63 N.E.2d 593, 294 N.Y. 610, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 754 (N.Y. 1945).
63 N.E.2d 593 (Matter of Grenfell (Lawyer)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schrader v. Cuevas
179 Misc. 2d 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Curcio v. Boyle
147 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Leirer v. Ashare
132 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Visser v. Magnarelli
530 F. Supp. 1165 (N.D. New York, 1982)
La Cagnina v. City of Schenectady
70 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
La Cagnina v. City of Schenectady
100 Misc. 2d 72 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Noonan v. O'Leary
284 A.D. 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
In re Yaras
283 A.D. 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Levy v. Burke
271 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)