Matter of Gregoire v. Baptiste

2024 NY Slip Op 02051
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 17, 2024
DocketDocket No. V-31266-16/22A
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 02051 (Matter of Gregoire v. Baptiste) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Gregoire v. Baptiste, 2024 NY Slip Op 02051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Gregoire v Baptiste (2024 NY Slip Op 02051)
Matter of Gregoire v Baptiste
2024 NY Slip Op 02051
Decided on April 17, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 17, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
LILLIAN WAN
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2022-05290
(Docket No. V-31266-16/22A)

[*1]In the Matter of Erick Gregoire, appellant,

v

Darline Baptiste, respondent. Erick Gregoire, Bayshore, NY, appellant pro se.


Liberty Aldrich, Brooklyn, NY (Janet Neustaetter, Rachel J. Stanton, and Beverly Gertler of counsel), attorney for the child.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lisa J. Friederwitzer, J.), dated June 17, 2022. The order dismissed, without a hearing, the father's petition to enforce the parental access provisions of an order of the same court (Amanda E. White, J.) dated April 20, 2017.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The subject child has reached the age of 18 and is no longer subject to the custody and parental access provisions of an order dated April 20, 2017 (see Family Ct Act § 119[c]; Matter of Jermaine T. [Jairam T.], 193 AD3d 943, 945; Matter of Chana J.A. v Barry S., 135 AD3d 743, 743). Therefore, the appeal from the order must be dismissed as academic.

DILLON, J.P., GENOVESI, WAN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Chana J.A. v. Barry S.
135 A.D.3d 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Jermaine T. (Jairam T.)
2021 NY Slip Op 02396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 02051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gregoire-v-baptiste-nyappdiv-2024.