Matter of Graham v. Lupuloff

2020 NY Slip Op 05049, 186 A.D.3d 1519, 129 N.Y.S.3d 343
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2020
Docket2020-03932
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05049 (Matter of Graham v. Lupuloff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Graham v. Lupuloff, 2020 NY Slip Op 05049, 186 A.D.3d 1519, 129 N.Y.S.3d 343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Graham v Lupuloff (2020 NY Slip Op 05049)
Matter of Graham v Lupuloff
2020 NY Slip Op 05049
Decided on September 23, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 23, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2020-03932

[*1]In the Matter of Jessica C. Graham, petitioner,

v

Karen Lupuloff, etc., et al., respondents.


Jessica C. Graham, Staten Island, NY, petitioner pro se.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Karen Lupuloff, a Judge of the Family Court, Richmond County, to accept the petitioner's order to show cause and to issue a decision thereon in a proceeding entitled Matter of Graham v Rawley, commenced in that court under Docket Nos. V-143/09 and V-961-09, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804[b], 506[b]; Matter of Tonawanda Seneca Nation v Noonan, 27 NY3d 713).

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Matter of Tonawanda Seneca Nation v. Hon. Robert C. Noonan
57 N.E.3d 1073 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 05049, 186 A.D.3d 1519, 129 N.Y.S.3d 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-graham-v-lupuloff-nyappdiv-2020.