Matter of Goma

California Court of Appeal

Matter of Goma

227 P. 1116, 67 Cal. App. 801, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 386

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 4, 1924

DocketCrim. No. 1069. Crim. No. 1083.

StatusPublished

This text of 227 P. 1116 (Matter of Goma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Goma, 227 P. 1116, 67 Cal. App. 801, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 386 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Each of the petitioners in the above-entitled proceedings is imprisoned upon a charge of having violated the provisions of a statute (Stats. 1923, p. 695) forbidding the possession by unnaturalized foreign-born persons of firearms of a certain character and description. [1] Petitioners contend that the act is unconstitutional on various grounds, but its constitutionality has recently been upheld by a decision of the supreme court which passes upon every question presented to them. See In re Rameriz, 193 Cal. 633 [34 A. L. R. 51,226 P. 914], where the provisions of the statute in question are more particularly set forth.

In each of these proceedings the writ is discharged and the petitioner is remanded.

Finlayson, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Each of the petitioners in the above-entitled proceedings is imprisoned upon a charge of having violated the provisions of a statute (Stats. 1923, p. 695) forbidding the possession by unnaturalized foreign-born persons of firearms of a certain character and description. [1] Petitioners contend that the act is unconstitutional on various grounds, but its constitutionality has recently been upheld by a decision of the supreme court which passes upon every question presented to them. See In re Rameriz, 193 Cal. 633 [34 A. L. R. 51,226 P. 914], where the provisions of the statute in question are more particularly set forth.

In each of these proceedings the writ is discharged and the petitioner is remanded.

Finlayson, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 P. 1116, 67 Cal. App. 801, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-goma-calctapp-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack