Matter of Goma
Opinion
Each of the petitioners in the above-entitled proceedings is imprisoned upon a charge of having violated the provisions of a statute (Stats. 1923, p. 695) forbidding the possession by unnaturalized foreign-born persons of firearms of a certain character and description. [1] Petitioners contend that the act is unconstitutional on various grounds, but its constitutionality has recently been upheld by a decision of the supreme court which passes upon every question presented to them. See In re Rameriz,
In each of these proceedings the writ is discharged and the petitioner is remanded.
Finlayson, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.
*Page 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
227 P. 1116 (Matter of Goma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.