Matter of Goldsmith v. Office of the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York

135 A.D.3d 441, 21 N.Y.S.3d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 7, 2016·No. 16559 2697/13·Published

Opinion

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Rita Mella, S.), entered on or about March 19, 2015, which dismissed the petition for a turnover of certain funds held by respondent Office of the Comptroller of the State of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Surrogate correctly determined that she had no jurisdiction to review the petition. The comptroller’s final determination of a claim for certain abandoned property “shall be reviewable by application to the supreme court, Albany county” (Abandoned Property Law § 1406 [1] [b]), except in limited circumstances not present in this case (id. § 1406 [3]). *442 Petitioner cannot evade this provision by commencing a turnover proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court. Concur — Acosta, J.P., Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Goldsmith v. Office of the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York, 135 A.D.3d 441, 21 N.Y.S.3d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 441 (Matter of Goldsmith v. Office of the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1406
New York ABP § 1406