Matter of Gloria B. v. Rachelle B.T.

179 N.Y.S.3d 584, 212 A.D.3d 452, 2023 NY Slip Op 00148
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 2023
DocketIndex No. O-02018-21 Appeal No. 17091 Case No. 2022-01293
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 N.Y.S.3d 584 (Matter of Gloria B. v. Rachelle B.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Gloria B. v. Rachelle B.T., 179 N.Y.S.3d 584, 212 A.D.3d 452, 2023 NY Slip Op 00148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Matter of Gloria B. v Rachelle B.T. (2023 NY Slip Op 00148)
Matter of Gloria B. v Rachelle B.T.
2023 NY Slip Op 00148
Decided on January 12, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 12, 2023
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.

Index No. O-02018-21 Appeal No. 17091 Case No. 2022-01293

[*1]In the Matter of Gloria B., Petitioner-Appellant,

v

Rachelle B.T., Respondent-Respondent.


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.



Order, Family Court, New York County (Pamela Scheininger, Court Attorney Referee), entered on or about March 16, 2022, which, upon a finding that respondent committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, issued a two-year order of protection against respondent in favor of petitioner and the subject child and declined to find aggravating circumstances, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of finding that aggravating circumstances exist and extending the expiration date of the order of protection until January 13, 2027, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court improvidently exercised its discretion in declining to find aggravating circumstances given the evidence that respondent repeatedly violated a final order of protection by sending harassing and intimidating text messages to petitioner and repeatedly calling her and hanging up (see Family Ct Act § 827[a][vii]; Matter of Jaynie S. v Gaetano D., 134 AD3d 473, 474 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 917 [2016]; Matter of Angela C. v Harris K., 102 AD3d 588, 589 [1st Dept 2013]). Under all the circumstances, we find that a five-year order of protection is warranted (see Family Ct Act § 842).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 12, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of S.T.B. (Gerald C.)
2024 NY Slip Op 01245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 N.Y.S.3d 584, 212 A.D.3d 452, 2023 NY Slip Op 00148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gloria-b-v-rachelle-bt-nyappdiv-2023.