Matter of Gliksman v. Burekhovich

2025 NY Slip Op 00218
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 2025·No. Docket No. O-9241-24·Published

Opinion

Matter of Gliksman v Burekhovich (2025 NY Slip Op 00218)
Matter of Gliksman v Burekhovich
2025 NY Slip Op 00218
Decided on January 15, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 15, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
LILLIAN WAN
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

2024-04737
(Docket No. O-9241-24)

[*1]In the Matter of Sarah R. Gliksman, appellant,

v

Shapsi Burekhovich, respondent.


Sarah R. Gliksman, Silver Spring, Maryland, appellant pro se.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Robert A. Markoff, J.), dated May 3, 2024. The order dismissed the petition for lack of standing.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner is the paternal grandmother of the subject child, who was born in 2017. The petitioner filed this family offense petition on behalf of the child, seeking an order of protection against the respondent, the child's maternal uncle. In an order dated May 3, 2024, the Family Court dismissed the petition for lack of standing. The petitioner appeals.

A person under the age of 18 may only appear by one of the representatives enumerated in CPLR 1201. "Unless the court appoints a guardian ad litem, an infant shall appear by the guardian of his [or her] property or, if there is no such guardian, by a parent having legal custody, or, if there is no such parent, by another person or agency having legal custody" (CPLR 1201; see Matter of Cohen v Escabar, 219 AD3d 726, 727). Here, since the petitioner did not have legal custody or legal guardianship of the child, the petitioner did not have standing to bring this proceeding on behalf of the child (see Diaz v Montefiore Med. Ctr. Henry & Lucy Moses Div., 299 AD2d 254, 254-255).

Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition.

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, WAN and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Gliksman v. Burekhovich, 2025 NY Slip Op 00218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 00218 (Matter of Gliksman v. Burekhovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. Montefiore Medical Center Henry & Lucy Moses Div.
299 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)