Matter of Gleason

19 A.3d 984, 206 N.J. 139, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 633
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 7, 2011·No. D-91 September Term 2010, 067956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-395, concluding that MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON of BOUND BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate to client in writing the basis or rate of the fee), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of R. 1:21-6), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Gleason, 19 A.3d 984, 206 N.J. 139, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 633 (N.J. 2011).

19 A.3d 984 (Matter of Gleason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Gensib
19 A.3d 984 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)