Matter of Genyard v. Braun

2017 NY Slip Op 1693, 148 A.D.3d 808, 47 N.Y.S.3d 910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2017
Docket2016-13131
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1693 (Matter of Genyard v. Braun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Genyard v. Braun, 2017 NY Slip Op 1693, 148 A.D.3d 808, 47 N.Y.S.3d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter aha, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent, Justice Evelyn L. Braun, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from transferring the petitioner’s habeas corpus petition in a proceeding entitled Matter of Genyard v Ponte, pending in Queens County, under Indictment No. 435/05, from Queens County to Chemung County, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

*809 “Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Dillon, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 1693, 148 A.D.3d 808, 47 N.Y.S.3d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-genyard-v-braun-nyappdiv-2017.