MATTER OF GAY ACTIVISTS ALLIANCE v. Lomenzo

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF GAY ACTIVISTS ALLIANCE v. Lomenzo

293 N.E.2d 255, 31 N.Y.2d 965, 341 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1527

DecidedJanuary 11, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 293 N.E.2d 255 (MATTER OF GAY ACTIVISTS ALLIANCE v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF GAY ACTIVISTS ALLIANCE v. Lomenzo, 293 N.E.2d 255, 31 N.Y.2d 965, 341 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1527 (N.Y. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Not-For-Profit Corporation Law mandates the Secretary of State to accept for filing a certificate of incorporation which meets the formal requirements of the statute and sets forth corporate purposes that are lawful. Since in the present case the appellants acknowledge that the formal requirements were complied with and that the purposes for which the corporation is to be formed offend against no law, the Secretary of State lacked the authority to label those purposes violative of “public policy.” (See Matter of Association for Preservation of Freedom of Choice v. Shapiro, 9 N Y 2d 376.) Nor does he possess the power to reject a certificate on the ground, asserted by him, that the proposed corporate name is “ not appropriate ”; the provision dealing with corporate names contains no such criterion or standard (N-PCL, § 301).

It follows, therefore, as the unanimous Appellate Division also concluded, that the Secretary of State’s refusal to accept the petitioner’s certificate was arbitrary, being in excess of his authority.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge Breitel taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Not-For-Profit Corporation Law mandates the Secretary of State to accept for filing a certificate of incorporation which meets the formal requirements of the statute and sets forth corporate purposes that are lawful. Since in the present case the appellants acknowledge that the formal requirements were complied with and that the purposes for which the corporation is to be formed offend against no law, the Secretary of State lacked the authority to label those purposes violative of “public policy.” (See Matter of Association for Preservation of Freedom of Choice v. Shapiro, 9 N Y 2d 376.) Nor does he possess the power to reject a certificate on the ground, asserted by him, that the proposed corporate name is “ not appropriate ”; the provision dealing with corporate names contains no such criterion or standard (N-PCL, § 301).

It follows, therefore, as the unanimous Appellate Division also concluded, that the Secretary of State’s refusal to accept the petitioner’s certificate was arbitrary, being in excess of his authority.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge Breitel taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 N.E.2d 255, 31 N.Y.2d 965, 341 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gay-activists-alliance-v-lomenzo-ny-1973.