Matter of Gavin v. Worner
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 8932 (Matter of Gavin v. Worner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Gavin v Worner |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 08932 |
| Decided on December 26, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2018-00610
(Docket No. F-1768-11/17H)
v
Lawrence J. Worner, respondent.
Stephen Bergstein, New Paltz, NY, for appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Victoria B. Campbell, J.), entered December 4, 2017. The order denied the mother's objections to an order of the same court (Barbara O. Afriyie, S.M.) entered October 16, 2017, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition for a downward modification of her child support obligation.
ORDERED that the order entered December 4, 2017, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Support Magistrate's determination in the order entered October 16, 2017, that the mother's petition for a downward modification of her child support obligation was barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see Matter of Mervil v Exhume, 165 AD3d 675; Goldman v Rio, 104 AD3d 729, 730; Matter of Waldman v Waldman, 47 AD3d 638, 639; Matter of Perna v Perna, 12 AD3d 448, 448). Having failed to show a substantial change in circumstances since the prior child support proceeding, the mother was precluded from relitigating the issue in this subsequent proceeding on her petition for a downward modification (see Matter of Figueroa v Herring, 61 AD3d 976, 977; Matter of Solis v Marmolejos, 50 AD3d 691, 692).
The mother's remaining contention is not properly before this Court.
Accordingly, we agree with the Family Court's denial of the mother's objections to the order entered October 16, 2017.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 8932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gavin-v-worner-nyappdiv-2018.