MATTER OF GATES v. McBRIDE TRANSP., INC.

455 N.E.2d 660, 60 N.Y.2d 670
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 27, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 455 N.E.2d 660 (MATTER OF GATES v. McBRIDE TRANSP., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF GATES v. McBRIDE TRANSP., INC., 455 N.E.2d 660, 60 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

60 N.Y.2d 670 (1983)

In the Matter of the Claim of Garland D. Gates, Claimant,
v.
McBride Transportation, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 27, 1983.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Peter H. Schiff, Carlin Meyer and Diane Ciccone of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spargo and Raymond C. Green for respondents.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

*671MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Workers' Compensation Board reinstated.

A finding of fact made by the Workers' Compensation Board is considered conclusive on the courts if supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Axel v Duffy-Mott Co., 47 N.Y.2d 1, 6). In this case, the board's finding that the claimant's heart attack was causally related to his employment was supported by substantial evidence: claimant's own testimony that he was irritated by a phone call he received, requiring him to redo an entire morning's work, and the fact that claimant experienced the heart attack very shortly after the phone call. In addition, there was medical testimony as to the causal relationship. Inasmuch as there was substantial evidence to support the determination of the board, the Appellate Division erred in reversing that determination.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and decision of the Workers' Compensation Board reinstated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Aungst v. Family Dollar
2025 NY Slip Op 06530 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)
Claim of Cameron v. Chalet
27 A.D.3d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Brisson v. County of Onondaga
844 N.E.2d 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Claim of Scalzo v. St. Joseph's Hospital
297 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Claim of Newton v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
293 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Wachtler v. AT&T
285 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Ochsner v. Gear
273 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Claim of Joslyn v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department
267 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Claim of Meisner v. United Parcel Service
243 A.D.2d 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Hildenbrandt v. Transportation Manufacturing Co.
244 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Lehsten v. NACM-Upstate New York
236 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Anayansi Blanchard v. Integrated Food Systems
220 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Winn v. Hudson Valley Equine Center
215 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Claim of Wright v. Golden Arrow Line, Inc.
206 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Claim of Sweeney v. New York State Staten Island Developmental Center
194 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Sturtevant v. Broome County
188 A.D.2d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Cooley v. New York State Police
158 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Claim of Curtis v. Adirondack Trailways
146 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cozzolino v. Ford Motor Co.
144 A.D.2d 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Matter of Black v. Metro. Tobacco
524 N.E.2d 873 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 N.E.2d 660, 60 N.Y.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gates-v-mcbride-transp-inc-ny-1983.