Matter of Gakhal v. Kelly

135 A.D.3d 406, 21 N.Y.S.3d 875
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 2016
Docket16051 113428/11
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 A.D.3d 406 (Matter of Gakhal v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Gakhal v. Kelly, 135 A.D.3d 406, 21 N.Y.S.3d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered April 16, 2014, which denied the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul respondents’ determination, dated August 11, 2011, denying petitioner accidental disability retirement (ADR) benefits, reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the matter remanded to respondents for a new determination consistent herewith.

An accident is defined as a “sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact” (Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 57 NY2d 1010, 1012 [1982] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, on the first day of training, petitioner lost control of a scooter, which accelerated to 40 miles per hour, and crashed into a metal barrier, causing the barrier and scooter to fall on top of her. The commanding officer of the training unit characterized the incident as “unexpected.” While injuries sustained during routine training exercises may not qualify for ADR benefits (see Matter of Becker v Ward, 169 AD2d 453 [1st Dept 1991] ), here, the loss of control coupled with the scooter’s acceleration, appears to have been sudden and out of the ordinary (see Matter of Starnella v Bratton, 92 NY2d 836, 839 [1998]; Matter of Flannelly v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Police Pension Fund, 278 AD2d 113 [1st Dept 2000] [officer’s trip and fall over a [407]*407tangle of television and VCR wires in police locker room, while performing routine security inspection, constituted a service-related accident as a matter of law]). Concur — Acosta, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Loia v. DiNapoliI
2018 NY Slip Op 5984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.3d 406, 21 N.Y.S.3d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gakhal-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2016.