Matter of Gabriella E. v. Joe V.

2021 NY Slip Op 03144, 143 N.Y.S.3d 875, 194 A.D.3d 542
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 18, 2021
DocketDocket No. V-02820/16, V-03795/16 Appeal No. 13847 Case No. 2018-04648
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03144 (Matter of Gabriella E. v. Joe V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Gabriella E. v. Joe V., 2021 NY Slip Op 03144, 143 N.Y.S.3d 875, 194 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Gabriella E. v Joe V. (2021 NY Slip Op 03144)
Matter of Gabriella E. v Joe V.
2021 NY Slip Op 03144
Decided on May 18, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 18, 2021
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

Docket No. V-02820/16, V-03795/16 Appeal No. 13847 Case No. 2018-04648

[*1]In the Matter of Gabriella E., Petitioner-Respondent,

v

Joe ., Respondent-Appellant.


The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, New York (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, for respondent.

Janet Neustaetter, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Rachel J. Stanton of counsel), attorney for the child.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Judith Lieb, J.), entered on or about February 7, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the petition for sole legal and physical custody of the subject child and denied respondent father's cross petition for custody, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly awarded petitioner mother sole custody of the child since she has always been the child's primary caregiver, respondent has never paid child support, and the child has a close bond with his half-sister, who lives with petitioner (see Matter of Rena M. v Derrick A., 122 AD3d 457, 458 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 29 NY3d 906

[2015]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 18, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Rena M. v. Derrick A.
122 A.D.3d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03144, 143 N.Y.S.3d 875, 194 A.D.3d 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-gabriella-e-v-joe-v-nyappdiv-2021.