Matter of Fifth Madison Corp.

95 N.E.2d 823, 301 N.Y. 772, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1056
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1950·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In ascertaining the amount of the gross income realized by the landlord on the subject property, it is essential to consider and rely upon — as the Appellate Division did — the rents being received by the landlord as of the date the rent fixation proceeding was begun. We pass upon no other question.

The orders of Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Cross appeals of the several tenants should be dismissed on the ground that they are not parties aggrieved.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur.

Orders affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Fifth Madison Corp., 95 N.E.2d 823, 301 N.Y. 772, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1056 (N.Y. 1950).

95 N.E.2d 823 (Matter of Fifth Madison Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Alibel Corp.
285 A.D. 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
In re Cara Realty Corp.
282 A.D. 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Matter of Court & Remsen Bldg. Corp.(pollack)
102 N.E.2d 696 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
In re Flatto
279 A.D. 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)