MATTER OF FEUERBACH v. Fuller Brush Co.

209 N.E.2d 98, 16 N.Y.2d 582
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 20, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.E.2d 98 (MATTER OF FEUERBACH v. Fuller Brush Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF FEUERBACH v. Fuller Brush Co., 209 N.E.2d 98, 16 N.Y.2d 582 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

16 N.Y.2d 582 (1965)

In the Matter of the Claim of Theodore Feuerbach, Respondent,
v.
Fuller Brush Co. et al., Appellants, and Rainville Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 14, 1965.
Decided May 20, 1965.

Louis Busell, Joseph M. Soviero and Joseph Di Fede for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel Polansky, Paxton Blair and Henriette Frieder of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Feuerbach v. Fuller Brush Co.
209 N.E.2d 98 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 N.E.2d 98, 16 N.Y.2d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-feuerbach-v-fuller-brush-co-ny-1965.