Matter of Falzone v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.

2017 NY Slip Op 303, 146 A.D.3d 882, 44 N.Y.S.3d 774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 18, 2017·No. 2015-11504·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c) to obtain pre-action disclosure, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baily-Schiffman, J.), dated September 10, 2015, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c) to obtain pre-action disclosure, and dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner has not demonstrated facts which fairly indicate that he has some cause of action against the respondents which warrants pre-action disclosure (see Matter of Konig v CSC Holdings, LLC, 112 AD3d 934, 935 [2013]; Matter of Scattoreggio v Cablevision Sys. Corp., 203 AD2d 468 [1994]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Dillon, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Falzone v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A., 2017 NY Slip Op 303, 146 A.D.3d 882, 44 N.Y.S.3d 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 303 (Matter of Falzone v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Konig v. CSC Holdings, LLC
112 A.D.3d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Scattoreggio v. Cablevision Systems Corp.
203 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)