Matter of Falls v. Hyun Chin Kim

223 A.D.3d 666, 201 N.Y.S.3d 253, 2024 NY Slip Op 00071
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 10, 2024·No. 2023-08626·Published

Opinion

Matter of Falls v Hyun Chin Kim (2024 NY Slip Op 00071)
Matter of Falls v Hyun Chin Kim
2024 NY Slip Op 00071
Decided on January 10, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
HELEN VOUTSINAS
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

2023-08626 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Raiquan K. Falls, petitioner,

v

Hyun Chin Kim, etc., respondent. Raiquan K. Falls, Goshen, NY, petitioner pro se.


Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Hyun Chin Kim, a Judge of the County Court, Orange County, to release the petitioner on his own recognizance from the custody of the Orange County Correctional Facility, and to dismiss the indictment in an action entitled People v Falls , commenced in that court under Indictment No. 54/23, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman , 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

The parties' remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination.

DILLON, J.P., DOWLING, VOUTSINAS and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Falls v. Hyun Chin Kim, 223 A.D.3d 666, 201 N.Y.S.3d 253, 2024 NY Slip Op 00071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

223 A.D.3d 666 (Matter of Falls v. Hyun Chin Kim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)