Matter of Espiritu v. Annucci

199 N.Y.S.3d 765, 222 A.D.3d 1153, 2023 NY Slip Op 06425
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 2023
DocketCV-22-2196
StatusPublished

This text of 199 N.Y.S.3d 765 (Matter of Espiritu v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Espiritu v. Annucci, 199 N.Y.S.3d 765, 222 A.D.3d 1153, 2023 NY Slip Op 06425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Matter of Espiritu v Annucci (2023 NY Slip Op 06425)
Matter of Espiritu v Annucci
2023 NY Slip Op 06425
Decided on December 14, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:December 14, 2023

CV-22-2196

[*1]In the Matter of Domingo Espiritu, Petitioner,

v

Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.


Calendar Date:November 9, 2023
Before:Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, McShan and Powers, JJ.

Domingo Espiritu, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondents.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the subject disciplinary determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's incarcerated individual account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Perkins v Annucci, 216 AD3d 1388, 1388 [3d Dept 2023]; Matter of Iverson v Annucci, 215 AD3d 1145, 1146 [3d Dept 2023]).

Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Iverson v. Annucci
187 N.Y.S.3d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.Y.S.3d 765, 222 A.D.3d 1153, 2023 NY Slip Op 06425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-espiritu-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2023.