MATTER OF ENGERT v. McNab
This text of 454 N.E.2d 535 (MATTER OF ENGERT v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*608 OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed, without costs, and petition to validate dismissed.
In Matter of Hutson v Bass (54 NY2d 772, 774), we emphasized that “[wjhile substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form, there must be strict compliance with statutory commands as to matters of prescribed content”. The failure of the petitioners to set forth on the cover sheet of their designating petition the information necessary to comply with subdivision 2 of section 6-134 of the Election Law is a matter of substance, and not form, and that “omission to include the prescribed information is fatal.” (Matter of Frome v Board of Elections, 57 NY2d 741, 742.)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 N.E.2d 535, 60 N.Y.2d 607, 467 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-engert-v-mcnab-ny-1983.