Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello

922 N.E.2d 881, 13 N.Y.3d 915, 895 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2010 NY Slip Op 191
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 2010·No. 55 SSM 51·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of issues raised but not considered on the appeal to that court. The Zoning Board’s determination, upholding the Planning Board’s denial of a building permit for petitioner to intensify an existing nonconforming use, was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the Town Code {see generally Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 612-613 [2004]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello, 922 N.E.2d 881, 13 N.Y.3d 915, 895 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2010 NY Slip Op 191 (N.Y. 2010).

922 N.E.2d 881 (Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Nabe v. Sosis
2019 NY Slip Op 6089 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello
76 A.D.2d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)