Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello

922 N.E.2d 881, 13 N.Y.3d 915, 895 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2010 NY Slip Op 191

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 2010

Docket55 SSM 51

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 922 N.E.2d 881 (Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Emrey Properties, Inc. v. Baranello, 922 N.E.2d 881, 13 N.Y.3d 915, 895 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2010 NY Slip Op 191 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of issues raised but not considered on the appeal to that court. The Zoning Board’s determination, upholding the Planning Board’s denial of a building permit for petitioner to intensify an existing nonconforming use, was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the Town Code {see generally Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 612-613 [2004]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of issues raised but not considered on the appeal to that court. The Zoning Board’s determination, upholding the Planning Board’s denial of a building permit for petitioner to intensify an existing nonconforming use, was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the Town Code {see generally Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 612-613 [2004]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 N.E.2d 881, 13 N.Y.3d 915, 895 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2010 NY Slip Op 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-emrey-properties-inc-v-baranello-ny-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack