Matter of Ellsman

572 N.E.2d 44, 77 N.Y.2d 926, 569 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 608
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed. Dismissal of the appeal taken as of right for lack of prosecution was a determination on the merits of all claims which could have been litigated had that appeal been timely argued or submitted (Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350). [See, 77 NY2d 835.]

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Ellsman, 572 N.E.2d 44, 77 N.Y.2d 926, 569 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 608 (N.Y. 1991).

572 N.E.2d 44 (Matter of Ellsman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunseri v. Macro Cellular Partners
263 A.D.2d 365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Flores v. Citizens International Bank
225 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)