Matter of Elevated Railroad v. . Flynn

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Elevated Railroad v. . Flynn

41 N.E. 704, 147 N.Y. 344, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 677, 1895 N.Y. LEXIS 956

DecidedOctober 29, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.E. 704 (Matter of Elevated Railroad v. . Flynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Elevated Railroad v. . Flynn, 41 N.E. 704, 147 N.Y. 344, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 677, 1895 N.Y. LEXIS 956 (N.Y. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, Oh. J.

No appeal lies to this court from the order of the General Term affirming the order of the Special Term confirming the report of the commissioners of appraisal. The condemnation proceedings were instituted under the provisions of the Rapid Transit Act (Ch. 606 of the Laws of 1875). The first report of the commissioners ivas sent back for correction on the application of the petitioner, and was corrected in certain particulars and, returned to the court at Special Term and was confirmed. The petitioner appealed from the order of confirmation to the General Term, where the order was affirmed. The petitioner seeks in this court to reverse the order of affirmance, on the ground that the commissioners treated the property of the respondent not as a *346 whole, but as consisting of three distinct parcels. The case shows that there was one tract on which there were three separate buildings, and the claim is that the depreciation of one piece should have been set off against the advantage to the others. The question does not go to the jurisdiction of the commissioners, and, upon the claim made, presents an error of law simply. We held in the case of The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company (128 W. Y. 600) that condemnation proceedings under the Rapid Transit Act were governed by the rule applicable to proceedings under the General Railroad Act of 1850, and that the determination of the Supreme Court at Special Term confirming the report of commissioners is final, and that no appeal therefrom to this court can be taken either for error of law or fact. A similar determination was made in The Matter of the Commissioners of the State Reservation at Miagara (102 N. Y. 734) under a statute nearly identical, so far as respects this question, with the Rapid Transit Act. If the case presented a question of jurisdiction the rule might be different. (Matter of S. B. R. R. Co., 143 N. Y. 253.)

The appeal should be dismissed.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, Oh. J.

No appeal lies to this court from the order of the General Term affirming the order of the Special Term confirming the report of the commissioners of appraisal. The condemnation proceedings were instituted under the provisions of the Rapid Transit Act (Ch. 606 of the Laws of 1875). The first report of the commissioners ivas sent back for correction on the application of the petitioner, and was corrected in certain particulars and, returned to the court at Special Term and was confirmed. The petitioner appealed from the order of confirmation to the General Term, where the order was affirmed. The petitioner seeks in this court to reverse the order of affirmance, on the ground that the commissioners treated the property of the respondent not as a *346 whole, but as consisting of three distinct parcels. The case shows that there was one tract on which there were three separate buildings, and the claim is that the depreciation of one piece should have been set off against the advantage to the others. The question does not go to the jurisdiction of the commissioners, and, upon the claim made, presents an error of law simply. We held in the case of The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company (128 W. Y. 600) that condemnation proceedings under the Rapid Transit Act were governed by the rule applicable to proceedings under the General Railroad Act of 1850, and that the determination of the Supreme Court at Special Term confirming the report of commissioners is final, and that no appeal therefrom to this court can be taken either for error of law or fact. A similar determination was made in The Matter of the Commissioners of the State Reservation at Miagara (102 N. Y. 734) under a statute nearly identical, so far as respects this question, with the Rapid Transit Act. If the case presented a question of jurisdiction the rule might be different. (Matter of S. B. R. R. Co., 143 N. Y. 253.)

The appeal should be dismissed.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.E. 704, 147 N.Y. 344, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 677, 1895 N.Y. LEXIS 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-elevated-railroad-v-flynn-ny-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack