Matter of El v. Swern

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2026
Docket2025-14599
StatusPublished

This text of Matter of El v. Swern (Matter of El v. Swern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of El v. Swern, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Matter of El v Swern - 2026 NY Slip Op 01960

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Court Decisions Resources About

Matter of El v Swern

2026 NY Slip Op 01960

April 1, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Yashua Ank Bey El, etc., petitioner,

v

Anne Swern, etc., respondent. Yashua Ank Bey El, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on April 1, 2026

2025-14599

Mark C. Dillon, J.P.

William G. Ford

Helen Voutsinas

James P. Mccormack, JJ.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anjali Bhat of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Anne Swern, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to sign a proposed order to show cause in an action entitled Citimortgage, Inc. v Bey El, pending in that court under Index No. 506724/25.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

DILLON, J.P., FORD, VOUTSINAS and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI