Matter of Ehrlich v. Kern
31 N.E.2d 763, 284 N.Y. 778, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1372
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., and Loughran, J., dissent on the ground that the appointments in this case were not temporary appointments within the meaning of the Civil Service Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Ehrlich v. Kern, 31 N.E.2d 763, 284 N.Y. 778, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1372 (N.Y. 1940).
31 N.E.2d 763 (Matter of Ehrlich v. Kern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.