Matter of Ehrenfeld

131 A.D.3d 1, 14 N.Y.S.3d 900
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 2015
DocketM-1822
StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.3d 1 (Matter of Ehrenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Ehrenfeld, 131 A.D.3d 1, 14 N.Y.S.3d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Samuel A. Ehrenfeld was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 28, 2001. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Department.

By motion dated April 27, 2015, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) seeks an order, pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 603.11, accepting respondent’s affidavit of resignation and striking his name from the roll of attorneys.

On July 8, 2011, respondent received a letter of caution from the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts for improper escrow practices, and on September 24, 2014, was publicly censured by the Second Department for failing to preserve a client’s $25,100 real estate down payment in his escrow account (123 AD3d 26 [2d Dept 2014]).

Respondent is currently the subject of an investigation by the Committee arising from a January 2015 complaint filed by the president of a school. The complaint alleged that in Febru *3 ary 2011, respondent was entrusted with $867,133 in escrow for the school, and then withdrew approximately $496,000 from escrow over the following four years without the school’s consent, knowledge or authorization.

This Court has previously accepted the resignation of attorneys under investigation for misappropriation of client funds from escrow (see Matter of Johnson, 125 AD3d 123 [1st Dept 2015]; Matter of Scher, 123 AD3d 162 [1st Dept 2014]). Respondent’s counsel has submitted an affirmation wherein he concurs in the relief sought by the Committee.

Accordingly, the Committee’s motion should be granted to the extent of accepting respondent’s resignation from the practice of law and striking his name from the roll of attorneys, effective nunc pro tunc to April 20, 2015.

Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Acosta, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to April 20, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ehrenfeld
123 A.D.3d 26 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Scher
123 A.D.3d 162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Johnson
125 A.D.3d 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.D.3d 1, 14 N.Y.S.3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ehrenfeld-nyappdiv-2015.