Matter of Edelmuth v. . Prendergast

95 N.E. 804, 202 N.Y. 602, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1171
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 1911·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The award to the relator did not hear interest until after a demand made on the comptroller for its payment. The appeal from the order of confirmation did not stay relator’s right to make such demand, but the demand made on July 10, 1910, was, in our opinion sufficient. Therefore, the relator is entitled to interest on the award from thirty days after that date until the award be paid.

The order of the Appellate Division should he reversed, and that of Special Term modified, so as to direct that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue directed to the respondent commanding him to pay the award made to the relator, with interest from August 10, 1910, until the date of payment thereof, without costs to either party in any court.

Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, .Chase and Collin, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Edelmuth v. . Prendergast, 95 N.E. 804, 202 N.Y. 602, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1171 (N.Y. 1911).

95 N.E. 804 (Matter of Edelmuth v. . Prendergast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands
217 A.D. 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
In re the City of New York
122 Misc. 109 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)
In re Starr
198 A.D. 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
In re City of New York
187 A.D. 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
In re the City of New York
184 A.D. 52 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Matter of City of New York (West 151st St.)
118 N.E. 807 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Matter of Minzesheimer v. . Prendergast
97 N.E. 717 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)