Matter of Ebrahimzadeh
This text of 140 A.D.3d 1466 (Matter of Ebrahimzadeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ali Ebrahimzadeh was admitted to practice by this Court in 2013. He was admitted to practice in California in 2003, where he maintains an office for the practice of law.
Pursuant to a stipulation with the California State Bar Court, Ebrahimzadeh admitted violating California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 4-200 (A), which prohibits an attorney from charging or collecting “an illegal or unconscionable fee.” In the stipulation, Ebrahimzadeh admitted charging and collecting such a fee from a vulnerable client with diminished capacity. As a sanction, the Supreme Court of California, by order filed December 16, 2015, among other things, suspended Ebrahimzadeh from the practice of law for two years, with all but the first six months stayed. Ebrahimzadeh provided timely notice to this Court of the disciplinary order as required by Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.19 (b). The Committee on Professional Standards now moves pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.19 for an order imposing discipline upon Ebrahimzadeh by reason of the discipline imposed in California. Ebrahimzadeh has submitted a response which presents only arguments in mitigation and does not raise any of the available defenses to said motion (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.19 [d]).
We grant the Committee’s motion and further conclude that, upon consideration of all of the facts and circumstances, including the discipline imposed in California, Ebrahimzadeh should be suspended in this state for a period of six months (see Matter of Yehl, 90 AD3d 1139 [2011]; Matter of Channing, 66 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2009]; Matter of Convery, 284 AD2d 557 [2001]).
Ordered that the motion of the Committee on Profes *1467 sional Standards is granted; and it is further ordered that Ali Ebrahimzadeh is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, Ali Ebrahimzadeh is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Ebrahimzadeh is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that Ali Ebrahimzadeh shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.D.3d 1466, 32 N.Y.S.3d 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ebrahimzadeh-nyappdiv-2016.