Matter of Earp v. Kramer

2024 NY Slip Op 05978
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 27, 2024
DocketDocket No. V-5208-11/21P
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 05978 (Matter of Earp v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Earp v. Kramer, 2024 NY Slip Op 05978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Earp v Kramer (2024 NY Slip Op 05978)
Matter of Earp v Kramer
2024 NY Slip Op 05978
Decided on November 27, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 27, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
BARRY E. WARHIT
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2022-07690
(Docket No. V-5208-11/21P)

[*1]In the Matter of Michael Earp, appellant,

v

Kristin Kramer, respondent.


Arza Rayches Feldman, Manhasset, NY, for appellant.

Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for respondent.

Geraldo Gutierrez, Jr., Poughkeepsie, NY, attorney for the child.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Joseph A. Egitto, J.), dated September 8, 2022. The order, after a hearing, denied the father's petition to modify the custody provisions of an order of the same court dated May 10, 2019, so as to award him physical custody of the subject child.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the subject child has turned 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the custody provisions of the order dated May 10, 2019. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Capruso v Kubow, 195 AD3d 614; Matter of Seoane v Nunez, 187 AD3d 926; Matter of Rodriguez v Sabbat, 185 AD3d 938).

DILLON, J.P., WOOTEN, WARHIT and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Rodriguez v. Sabbat
2020 NY Slip Op 4170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Seoane v. Nunez
2020 NY Slip Op 05761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Capruso v. Kubow
2021 NY Slip Op 03453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 05978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-earp-v-kramer-nyappdiv-2024.