Matter of Dyviniek v. Buffalo Courier Express Co.
This text of 73 N.E.2d 552 (Matter of Dyviniek v. Buffalo Courier Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
There was no evidence to support the findings of the Workmen’s Compensation Board that the claimant contracted typhoid fever or suffered any accidental injury from which typhoid fever naturally or unavoidably resulted in the course of his employment from food and drink consumed in the flood area to which he was assigned. The lack of any evidence connecting the disease with accidental injury in the course of employment may not be supplied by the statutory presumption (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 21; Matter of Daus v. Gunderman & Sons, Inc., 283 N. Y. 459, 466; Matter of Lorchitsky v. Gotham Folding Box Co., 230 N. Y. 8, 12).
The order of the Appellate Division and the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board should be reversed and the claim dismissed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 N.E.2d 552, 296 N.Y. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dyviniek-v-buffalo-courier-express-co-ny-1947.