Matter of Dygert

Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1976·No. 13239·Published

Opinion

No. 13239

I N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF M N A A OTN

I N THE MATTER O THE ESTATE OF F LAURA M. DYGERT, Deceased.

Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court of t h e F i f t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Hon. Frank E. B l a i r , Judge p r e s i d i n g .

Counsel o f Record:

For Appellant :

C h e s t e r L. J o n e s , County A t t o r n e y , V i r g i n i a C i t y , Montana

F o r Respondent:

Morrow, Nash and Sedivy, Bozeman, Montana

Argument s u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s .

Submitted: A p r i l 20, 1976

Decided : $7,- < 1 ,? r:q Filed: .' Mr. J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court.

T h i s i s a n a p p e a l from a n o r d e r of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ,

Madison County, g r a n t i n g a t t o r n e y f e e s and c o s t s t o a n u n s u c c e s s -

f u l a p p l i c a n t f o r l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n .

Laura M. Dygert, a n 87 y e a r o l d r e s i d e n t o f Madison

County, d i e d o n May 9, 1975. She had been i n a n u r s i n g home

s e v e r a l y e a r s b e f o r e h e r d e a t h and d u r i n g t h a t p e r i o d a g u a r d i a n -

s h i p had been e s t a b l i s h e d t o p r o t e c t h e r e s t a t e and c a r e f o r h e r

needs. By agreement of h e r r e l a t i v e s , Dan Vernon McLean had

been a p p o i n t e d g u a r d i a n of h e r e s t a t e . McLean i s t h e son-in-law

o f Marie Paugh, a n i e c e o f Laura Dygert.

On May 1 2 , 1975, McLean a p p l i e d t o t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

f o r appointment a s s p e c i a l a d m i n i s t r a t o r f o r t h e p r o b a t e of t h e

w i l l and f o r l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . Marie Paugh, a n i e c e and

l e g a t e e , f i l e d a p e t i t i o n nominating McLean, a l l e g i n g t h a t P e r s h i n g

Pankey, a C a l i f o r n i a r e s i d e n t , j o i n e d i n t h a t nomination. Persh-

i n g Pankey i s a l e g a t e e and t h e r e s i d u a r y d e v i s e e and l e g a t e e

under t h e w i l l of Laura M. Dygert.

Three d a y s l a t e r , on May 1 5 , 1975, P e r s h i n g Pankey, a c t i n g

t h r o u g h h i s a t t o r n e y C h e s t e r Lloyd J o n e s , f i l e d o b j e c t i o n s t o t h e

appointment o f McLean by r e a s o n of a l l e g e d misconduct i n t h e

h a n d l i n g of t h e g u a r d i a n s h i p . O May 20, 1975, a p e t i t i o n f o r n

p r o b a t e o f w i l l and f o r l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n was f i l e d by

C h e s t e r J o n e s , a s nominee o f P e r s h i n g Pankey.

S h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r Marie Paugh f i l e d a w i t h d r a w a l o f

p e t i t i o n , a l o n g w i t h McLean, f o r t h e a p p o i n t m e n t of McLean a s ad-

m i n i s t r a t o r and on J u n e 11, 1975, f i l e d o b j e c t i o n s t o t h e a p p o i n t -

ment of C h e s t e r Lloyd J o n e s a s a d m i n i s t r a t o r . O t h a t same d a t e n

s h e f i l e d h e r own p e t i t i o n t o b e a p p o i n t e d .

Hearing was h e l d on t h e a p p l i c a t i o n s and o b j e c t i o n s and

t h e r e a f t e r t h e c o u r t i s s u e d a n o r d e r a p p o i n t i n g C h e s t e r Lloyd J o n e s t o s e r v e a s a d m i n i s t r a t o r w i t h w i l l annexed and he pro-

ceeded t o p r o b a t e t h e e s t a t e .

On August 1, 1975, Marie Paugh, t h e u n s u c c e s s f u l pe-

t i t i o n e r , s u b m i t t e d a c l a i m t o C h e s t e r J o n e s i n t h e amount of

$466.34 f o r h e r c o s t s of f i l i n g , p u b l i c a t i o n and a t t o r n e y f e e s .

The c l a i m was r e j e c t e d and Marie Paugh f i l e d a p e t i t i o n f o r

a l l o w a n c e of t h e c l a i m under t h e p r o v i s i o n s of s e c t i o n 91A-3-806,

R.C.M. 1947, Montana Uniform P r o b a t e Code. Objections w e r e f i l e d

by t h e a d m i n i s t r a t o r . The d i s t r i c t c o u r t r e n d e r e d a d e c i s i o n

a l l o w i n g c o s t s i n t h e amount o f $32.20 and a t t o r n e y f e e s i n t h e

amount of $300. This appeal followed.

The s o l e i s s u e i s whether a n u n s u c c e s s f u l a p p l i c a n t f o r

l e t t e r s o f a d m i n i s t r a t i o n i s e n t i t l e d t o be p a i d a t t o r n e y f e e s

and c o s t s o u t of t h e e s t a t e of t h e d e c e d e n t ?

W e answer i n t h e n e g a t i v e . There i s no d i r e c t a u t h o r i t y

i n Montana on t h i s p o i n t , s o w e l o o k t o o t h e r j u r i s d i c t i o n s . As

a m a t t e r of p u b l i c p o l i c y it would be unwise t o a l l o w t h e f u n d i n g

of l i t i g a t i o n o u t of a n e s t a t e r e s i d u e .

The c o u r t s are n o t i n agreement a s t o whether a t t o r n e y

f e e s i n c u r r e d i n p r o c e e d i n g s t o d e t e r m i n e who s h o u l d be a p p o i n t e d

t o administer an estate a r e allowable a s charges a g a i n s t t h e e s t a t e .

The a n n o t a t i o n a t 90 A.L.R. 1 0 1 , ( P i n g r e e v. F i r s t S a v i n g s Bank

o f Ogden, 82 Utah 437, 25 P.2d 937) n o t e s t h a t a d e c e d e n t ' s es-

t a t e may n o t be c h a r g e d w i t h e x p e n s e s i n c i d e n t t o l i t i g a t i o n be-

tween r i v a l c l a i m a n t s o f t h e r i g h t t o l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n .

P i n g r e e was c i t e d and d i s c u s s e d by t h i s C o u r t i n I n r e

Ruane's E s t a t e , 125 Mont. 2 0 4 , 233 P.2d 400, where t h e adminis-

t r a t r i x o f t h e e s t a t e a p p e a l e d from a d i s a l l o w a n c e of c e r t a i n

expense i t e m s a f t e r s u b m i t t i n g h e r f i r s t a n n u a l a c c o u n t and h e r

a t t o r n e y a p p e a l e d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s f a i l u r e t o a l l o w him t r a v e l

e x p e n s e s from h i s home t o t h e p r o b a t e c o u r t where t h e e s t a t e w a s being administered. T h i s C o u r t found t h e l i t i g a t i o n t h a t ensued

i n a c o n t e s t t o a d m i n i s t e r t h e e s t a t e was n o t i n a n y w i s e bene-

f i c i a l t o t h e e s t a t e o r t h e b e n e f i c i a r i e s and t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

p r o p e r l y r e j e c t e d a t t o r n e y f e e s and e x p e n s e s f o r c o n d u c t i n g t h a t

litigation.

W e n o t e t h a t s e c t i o n s 93-8601 and 91-3405, R.C.M. 1947,

which w e r e i n e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e o f t h e h e a r i n g f o r l e t t e r s o f

a d m i n i s t r a t i o n s h o u l d be c o n s i d e r e d . S e c t i o n 93-8601, permits

t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n and a l l o w a n c e o f a t t o r n e y f e e s f o r " a d m i n i s -

t r a t o r s , e x e c u t o r s , g u a r d i a n s , and t r u s t e e s , and a g e n t s a p p o i n t e d

by t h e c o u r t . " Emphasis h e r e s h o u l d be made t o t h e words " a p p o i n t -

ed by t h e c o u r t . " Under t h e l a n g u a g e o f t h e s t a t u t e , t h e r e i s

no a u t h o r i t y f o r payment o f f e e s t o a n u n s u c c e s s f u l a p p l i c a n t .

S e c t i o n 91-3405, R.C.M. 1947, p r o v i d e s f o r d e t e r m i n a t i o n

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Dygert, (Mo. 1976).

Matter of Dygert (Matter of Dygert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allied Mills, Inc. v. Horton
65 F.2d 708 (Seventh Circuit, 1933)
Pingree v. First Sav. Bank of Ogden
25 P.2d 937 (Utah Supreme Court, 1933)