Matter of Dygert

Montana Supreme Court

Matter of Dygert

DecidedMay 13, 1976

Docket13239

StatusPublished

This text of Matter of Dygert (Matter of Dygert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Dygert, (Mo. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

No. 13239

I N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF M N A A OTN

I N THE MATTER O THE ESTATE OF F LAURA M. DYGERT, Deceased.

Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court of t h e F i f t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Hon. Frank E. B l a i r , Judge p r e s i d i n g .

Counsel o f Record:

For Appellant :

C h e s t e r L. J o n e s , County A t t o r n e y , V i r g i n i a C i t y , Montana

F o r Respondent:

Morrow, Nash and Sedivy, Bozeman, Montana

Argument s u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s .

Submitted: A p r i l 20, 1976

Decided : $7,- < 1 ,? r:q Filed: .' Mr. J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court.

T h i s i s a n a p p e a l from a n o r d e r of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ,

Madison County, g r a n t i n g a t t o r n e y f e e s and c o s t s t o a n u n s u c c e s s -

f u l a p p l i c a n t f o r l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n .

Laura M. Dygert, a n 87 y e a r o l d r e s i d e n t o f Madison

County, d i e d o n May 9, 1975. She had been i n a n u r s i n g home

s e v e r a l y e a r s b e f o r e h e r d e a t h and d u r i n g t h a t p e r i o d a g u a r d i a n -

s h i p had been e s t a b l i s h e d t o p r o t e c t h e r e s t a t e and c a r e f o r h e r

needs. By agreement of h e r r e l a t i v e s , Dan Vernon McLean had

been a p p o i n t e d g u a r d i a n of h e r e s t a t e . McLean i s t h e son-in-law

o f Marie Paugh, a n i e c e o f Laura Dygert.

On May 1 2 , 1975, McLean a p p l i e d t o t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

f o r appointment a s s p e c i a l a d m i n i s t r a t o r f o r t h e p r o b a t e of t h e

w i l l and f o r l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . Marie Paugh, a n i e c e and

l e g a t e e , f i l e d a p e t i t i o n nominating McLean, a l l e g i n g t h a t P e r s h i n g

Pankey, a C a l i f o r n i a r e s i d e n t , j o i n e d i n t h a t nomination. Persh-

i n g Pankey i s a l e g a t e e and t h e r e s i d u a r y d e v i s e e and l e g a t e e

under t h e w i l l of Laura M. Dygert.

Three d a y s l a t e r , on May 1 5 , 1975, P e r s h i n g Pankey, a c t i n g

t h r o u g h h i s a t t o r n e y C h e s t e r Lloyd J o n e s , f i l e d o b j e c t i o n s t o t h e

appointment o f McLean by r e a s o n of a l l e g e d misconduct i n t h e

h a n d l i n g of t h e g u a r d i a n s h i p . O May 20, 1975, a p e t i t i o n f o r n

p r o b a t e o f w i l l and f o r l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n was f i l e d by

C h e s t e r J o n e s , a s nominee o f P e r s h i n g Pankey.

S h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r Marie Paugh f i l e d a w i t h d r a w a l o f

p e t i t i o n , a l o n g w i t h McLean, f o r t h e a p p o i n t m e n t of McLean a s ad-

m i n i s t r a t o r and on J u n e 11, 1975, f i l e d o b j e c t i o n s t o t h e a p p o i n t -

ment of C h e s t e r Lloyd J o n e s a s a d m i n i s t r a t o r . O t h a t same d a t e n

s h e f i l e d h e r own p e t i t i o n t o b e a p p o i n t e d .

Hearing was h e l d on t h e a p p l i c a t i o n s and o b j e c t i o n s and

t h e r e a f t e r t h e c o u r t i s s u e d a n o r d e r a p p o i n t i n g C h e s t e r Lloyd J o n e s t o s e r v e a s a d m i n i s t r a t o r w i t h w i l l annexed and he pro-

ceeded t o p r o b a t e t h e e s t a t e .

On August 1, 1975, Marie Paugh, t h e u n s u c c e s s f u l pe-

t i t i o n e r , s u b m i t t e d a c l a i m t o C h e s t e r J o n e s i n t h e amount of

$466.34 f o r h e r c o s t s of f i l i n g , p u b l i c a t i o n and a t t o r n e y f e e s .

The c l a i m was r e j e c t e d and Marie Paugh f i l e d a p e t i t i o n f o r

a l l o w a n c e of t h e c l a i m under t h e p r o v i s i o n s of s e c t i o n 91A-3-806,

R.C.M. 1947, Montana Uniform P r o b a t e Code. Objections w e r e f i l e d

by t h e a d m i n i s t r a t o r . The d i s t r i c t c o u r t r e n d e r e d a d e c i s i o n

a l l o w i n g c o s t s i n t h e amount o f $32.20 and a t t o r n e y f e e s i n t h e

amount of $300. This appeal followed.

The s o l e i s s u e i s whether a n u n s u c c e s s f u l a p p l i c a n t f o r

l e t t e r s o f a d m i n i s t r a t i o n i s e n t i t l e d t o be p a i d a t t o r n e y f e e s

and c o s t s o u t of t h e e s t a t e of t h e d e c e d e n t ?

W e answer i n t h e n e g a t i v e . There i s no d i r e c t a u t h o r i t y

i n Montana on t h i s p o i n t , s o w e l o o k t o o t h e r j u r i s d i c t i o n s . As

a m a t t e r of p u b l i c p o l i c y it would be unwise t o a l l o w t h e f u n d i n g

of l i t i g a t i o n o u t of a n e s t a t e r e s i d u e .

The c o u r t s are n o t i n agreement a s t o whether a t t o r n e y

f e e s i n c u r r e d i n p r o c e e d i n g s t o d e t e r m i n e who s h o u l d be a p p o i n t e d

t o administer an estate a r e allowable a s charges a g a i n s t t h e e s t a t e .

The a n n o t a t i o n a t 90 A.L.R. 1 0 1 , ( P i n g r e e v. F i r s t S a v i n g s Bank

o f Ogden, 82 Utah 437, 25 P.2d 937) n o t e s t h a t a d e c e d e n t ' s es-

t a t e may n o t be c h a r g e d w i t h e x p e n s e s i n c i d e n t t o l i t i g a t i o n be-

tween r i v a l c l a i m a n t s o f t h e r i g h t t o l e t t e r s of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n .

P i n g r e e was c i t e d and d i s c u s s e d by t h i s C o u r t i n I n r e

Ruane's E s t a t e , 125 Mont. 2 0 4 , 233 P.2d 400, where t h e adminis-

t r a t r i x o f t h e e s t a t e a p p e a l e d from a d i s a l l o w a n c e of c e r t a i n

expense i t e m s a f t e r s u b m i t t i n g h e r f i r s t a n n u a l a c c o u n t and h e r

a t t o r n e y a p p e a l e d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s f a i l u r e t o a l l o w him t r a v e l

e x p e n s e s from h i s home t o t h e p r o b a t e c o u r t where t h e e s t a t e w a s being administered. T h i s C o u r t found t h e l i t i g a t i o n t h a t ensued

i n a c o n t e s t t o a d m i n i s t e r t h e e s t a t e was n o t i n a n y w i s e bene-

f i c i a l t o t h e e s t a t e o r t h e b e n e f i c i a r i e s and t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

p r o p e r l y r e j e c t e d a t t o r n e y f e e s and e x p e n s e s f o r c o n d u c t i n g t h a t

litigation.

W e n o t e t h a t s e c t i o n s 93-8601 and 91-3405, R.C.M. 1947,

which w e r e i n e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e o f t h e h e a r i n g f o r l e t t e r s o f

a d m i n i s t r a t i o n s h o u l d be c o n s i d e r e d . S e c t i o n 93-8601, permits

t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n and a l l o w a n c e o f a t t o r n e y f e e s f o r " a d m i n i s -

t r a t o r s , e x e c u t o r s , g u a r d i a n s , and t r u s t e e s , and a g e n t s a p p o i n t e d

by t h e c o u r t . " Emphasis h e r e s h o u l d be made t o t h e words " a p p o i n t -

ed by t h e c o u r t . " Under t h e l a n g u a g e o f t h e s t a t u t e , t h e r e i s

no a u t h o r i t y f o r payment o f f e e s t o a n u n s u c c e s s f u l a p p l i c a n t .

S e c t i o n 91-3405, R.C.M. 1947, p r o v i d e s f o r d e t e r m i n a t i o n

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI