Home/New York Court of Appeals/Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.

Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.

68 N.E.2d 53, 295 N.Y. 968, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1109
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 1946·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment of Appellate Division so far as appealed from reversed and that of Special Term in favor of appellant Hershkopf affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division on the ground that the allowance made by the Special Term to the arbitrator was lawful under sections 1457 and 1545 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.

Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Ftjld, JJ. Lotjghran, Ch. J., and Thacher, J., dissent on the ground that the Appellate Division, correctly construed sections 1457 and 1545 of the Civil Practice Act. Taking no part: Dye, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc., 68 N.E.2d 53, 295 N.Y. 968, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1109 (N.Y. 1946).

68 N.E.2d 53 (Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northerly Corp. v. Hermett Realty Corp.
17 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
In re the Arbitration between Terminal Auxiliar Maritima, S. A. & Winkler Credit Corp.
32 Misc. 2d 871 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
In re the Arbitration between Cocotos Steamship of Panama, S. A. & Hugo Neu Corp.
20 Misc. 2d 607 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Rosenfield v. Rosenfield
205 Misc. 1095 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)