Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.
This text of 68 N.E.2d 53 (Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of Appellate Division so far as appealed from reversed and that of Special Term in favor of appellant Hershkopf affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division on the ground that the allowance made by the Special Term to the arbitrator was lawful under sections 1457 and 1545 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Ftjld, JJ. Lotjghran, Ch. J., and Thacher, J., dissent on the ground that the Appellate Division, correctly construed sections 1457 and 1545 of the Civil Practice Act. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.E.2d 53, 295 N.Y. 968, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dubinsky-v-joseph-love-inc-ny-1946.