Matter of D.S. v. C.B.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 23, 2026
DocketDocket No. O-07736/23, O-07774/23, O-08114/23|Appeal No. 6940|Case No. 2025-07184|
StatusPublished

This text of Matter of D.S. v. C.B. (Matter of D.S. v. C.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of D.S. v. C.B., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Matter of D.S. v C.B. - 2026 NY Slip Op 03928
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Matter of D.S. v C.B.

2026 NY Slip Op 03928

June 23, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of D.S., Respondent,

v

C.B., Appellant.

Decided and Entered: June 23, 2026

Docket No. O-07736/23, O-07774/23, O-08114/23|Appeal No. 6940|Case No. 2025-07184|

Before: Renwick, P.J., Scarpulla, González, Rodriguez, O'neill Levy, JJ.

Dora M. Lassinger, Long Beach, for appellant.

D. S., respondent pro se.

[*1]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Stephanie Schwartz, J.), entered on or about November 6, 2025, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissed petitioner C. B.'s family offense petitions against respondent D. S., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court properly denied the petitions, as petitioner C. B. failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence that respondent D. S. committed the offenses of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26), assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00[1]), and attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 110.00). Family Court's determination not to credit petitioner's

testimony is entitled to great deference, and there is no basis to disturb its findings (see Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P., 61 AD3d 489, 489 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 23, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matter of D.S. v. C.B., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ds-v-cb-nyappdiv-2026.