Matter of Downey v. City of N. Tonawanda

217 A.D.3d 1526, 190 N.Y.S.3d 551, 2023 NY Slip Op 03605
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 30, 2023
Docket358 CA 22-00381
StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.3d 1526 (Matter of Downey v. City of N. Tonawanda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Downey v. City of N. Tonawanda, 217 A.D.3d 1526, 190 N.Y.S.3d 551, 2023 NY Slip Op 03605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Matter of Downey v City of N. Tonawanda (2023 NY Slip Op 03605)
Matter of Downey v City of N. Tonawanda
2023 NY Slip Op 03605
Decided on June 30, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, OGDEN, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.

358 CA 22-00381

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN DOWNEY, KIMBERLY DOWNEY, GARY HOWARTH, BERNADETTE HOWARTH, PAUL GORMAN, LESLIE GORMAN, GEORGE SIRADAS, DAVID FRIEDER, BEVERLY DIPALMA, JIM DIPALMA, BRIAN MCKENNA, LINDA MCKENNA, LOU SZYMANSKI, JEANETTE TACKETT, KEN TACKETT, MARK DREISS, JENNIFER STACHNIC, SUSAN FOX, WALTER DONALDSON, DAVID MILLER, MERLE SCHRECKENGOST, MARK COOPER, PHIL GRALNIK, NANCY GRALNIK, SHARON DOLL, PAT OGDEN, MARY MARTIN, TIM MARTIN, DEEDEE SOLMAN, JAY SOLMAN AND OLGA MELKOZEROVA, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

v

CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA, THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA, AND MCW CONSTRUCTION, INC., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.


LIPPES & LIPPES, BUFFALO (RICHARD J. LIPPES OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS.

MICHAEL G. PUTZAK, NORTH TONAWANDA, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT MCW CONSTRUCTION, INC.



Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank A. Sedita, III, J.), entered February 1, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, inter alia, dismissed the third amended petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 30, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.D.3d 1526, 190 N.Y.S.3d 551, 2023 NY Slip Op 03605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-downey-v-city-of-n-tonawanda-nyappdiv-2023.