MATTER OF DORMAN v. New Process Gear Div. Chrysler Corp.
35 N.Y.2d 975
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Martha Dorman, Respondent,
v.
New Process Gear Division Chrysler Corporation, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
George R. Wolff for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG. Taking no part: Judge COOKE.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF DORMAN v. New Process Gear Div. Chrysler Corp., 35 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1975).
35 N.Y.2d 975 (MATTER OF DORMAN v. New Process Gear Div. Chrysler Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Pearson v. New York City Transit Authority
146 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Claim of Hernandez v. Carpet
91 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Burlingame v. Mobil Chemical Co.
61 A.D.2d 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Claim of Zengotita v. New York Telephone Co.
58 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Claim of Macinski v. Village of Johnson City
57 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Claim of Orientale v. Marcus Associates, Inc.
51 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Claim of Dapp v. New York State Liquor Authority
50 A.D.2d 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)