MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin
This text of 530 N.E.2d 1286 (MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (134 AD2d 350). We add only that there was no abuse of discretion in ordering that respondent must accept State-ready inmates from petitioner’s custody within 14 days of sentencing unless exigent circumstances which justify a further limited delay are present in a particular case. (See also, Matter of Ayers v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 346 [decided today]).
*986 Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 N.E.2d 1286, 72 N.Y.2d 984, 534 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dooley-v-coughlin-ny-1988.