Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin

MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin

530 N.E.2d 1286, 72 N.Y.2d 984, 534 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2689
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1988·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (134 AD2d 350). We add only that there was no abuse of discretion in ordering that respondent must accept State-ready inmates from petitioner’s custody within 14 days of sentencing unless exigent circumstances which justify a further limited delay are present in a particular case. (See also, Matter of Ayers v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 346 [decided today]).

*986 Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin, 530 N.E.2d 1286, 72 N.Y.2d 984, 534 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2689 (N.Y. 1988).

530 N.E.2d 1286 (MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Morejon v. New York State Board of Parole
183 Misc. 2d 435 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Higgins v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
171 Misc. 2d 629 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Ayers v. Coughlin
530 N.E.2d 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)