MATTER OF DOE v. Kuriansky
451 N.E.2d 502, 59 N.Y.2d 836, 464 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3164
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 1068; see, also, Matter of Grand Jury Investigation of Onondaga County, 59 NY2d 130; Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings [Doe], 56 NY2d 348).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF DOE v. Kuriansky, 451 N.E.2d 502, 59 N.Y.2d 836, 464 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3164 (N.Y. 1983).
451 N.E.2d 502 (MATTER OF DOE v. Kuriansky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Bergamo Medical, P.C.
17 Misc. 3d 182 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Doe v. Kuriansky
158 Misc. 2d 797 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Atkins v. Guest
158 Misc. 2d 426 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum v. Kuriansky
505 N.E.2d 925 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated December 14, 1984 v. Kuriansky
113 A.D.2d 49 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Varas
110 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)