Matter of Discipline of Reutter

361 N.W.2d 68, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 968
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 25, 1985
DocketC4-84-1032
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 361 N.W.2d 68 (Matter of Discipline of Reutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Discipline of Reutter, 361 N.W.2d 68, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 968 (Mich. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board has petitioned this court for disciplinary action against respondent Robert D. Reutter, recommending disbarment. We concur with the Board’s recommendation and disbar respondent.

On March 22, 1984, respondent was found guilty on two counts of aiding and abetting in the distribution of cocaine in Circuit Court, Second Judicial Circuit, Minnehaha County, South Dakota. Respondent was also found guilty of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. The convictions were for illegal conduct covering a period of almost 2 years from March 1981 to January 1983. On May 18, 1984, the South Dakota court sentenced respondent to 14 years imprisonment in the South Dakota State Penitentiary.

One of respondent’s co-conspirators in the crimes committed was David J. Trygs-tad. Trygstad was formally a licensed Minnesota attorney. On January 21, 1983, Trygstad pled guilty to two counts of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. This court, upon stipulation, disbarred Trygstad on August 9, 1983. See In re Trygstad, 338 N.W.2d 9 (Minn.1983).

Respondent failed to answer the director’s petition in these proceedings although he was personally served on June 28, 1984 nor has he otherwise appeared. The charges in the director’s petition are therefore deemed admitted.

We have already disbarred respondent’s co-conspirator Trygstad. We find no mitigating circumstances to distinguish this case from other cases where we have disbarred lawyers for being convicted of serious felonies.

Robert D. Reutter is herewith disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Chacon
581 N.W.2d 355 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1998)
In Re Reinstatement of Reutter
474 N.W.2d 343 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1991)
In Re Frick
694 S.W.2d 473 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 N.W.2d 68, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-discipline-of-reutter-minn-1985.