Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thibodeau

2007 WI 118, 738 N.W.2d 558, 305 Wis. 2d 21, 2007 Wisc. LEXIS 585
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 18, 2007
Docket2007AP768-D
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2007 WI 118 (Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thibodeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thibodeau, 2007 WI 118, 738 N.W.2d 558, 305 Wis. 2d 21, 2007 Wisc. LEXIS 585 (Wis. 2007).

Opinion

*22 PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney James D. Thibodeau pursuant to SCR 22.12 1 wherein Attorney Thibodeau admits to the facts and professional misconduct involving his trust account as alleged by the OLR in its complaint. Attorney Thibodeau also assents to the level of discipline sought by the OLR director, a 60-day suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin.

¶ 2. We adopt the stipulated facts and conclusions of law. We agree that Attorney Thibodeau's misconduct warrants the suspension of his license to practice law for a period of 60 days. The OLR has stated that it does not seek to impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney Thibodeau and we accede to that recommendation.

¶ 3. Attorney Thibodeau was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1984 and practices in LaCrosse. He has no prior disciplinary history.

¶ 4. The Wisconsin Department of Revenue filed tax warrants against Attorney Thibodeau in 1999, 2001, and 2004. Two of the tax warrants had not been *23 satisfied as of April 8, 2005. On February 25, 2005, Attorney Thibodeau deposited a $10,000 check to his trust account. On April 8, 2005, he deposited a $9,113.75 check to his trust account. Each of these checks represented funds belonging to Attorney Thi-bodeau from lumber sales. Both Attorney Thibodeau's business and personal accounts had previously been garnished for taxes. He deposited these two lumber checks into his trust account in an attempt to avoid seizure of his funds by tax authorities.

¶ 5. On August 5, 2005, Attorney Thibodeau deposited a $2000 check to his trust account, which constituted a payment of attorney fees owed by an estate. Between January 1, 2005, and August 17, 2005, Attorney Thibodeau was holding less funds in trust than he should have been holding, relating to various clients and WisTAF interest. During that time he also deposited personal funds into his trust account and gave a client a trust account check largely comprised of Attorney Thibodeau's personal funds. Between January 17, 2005, and August 22, 2005, Attorney Thibodeau made 13 transfers from his trust account via telephone. He failed to maintain a transaction register for his trust account and failed to maintain individual client ledgers. He also inaccurately certified to the State Bar of Wisconsin that he had complied with the trust account record keeping requirements.

¶ 6. On April 4, 2007, the OLR filed a nine count disciplinary complaint against Attorney Thibodeau. On July 2, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation whereby Attorney Thibodeau stipulated to the following counts of misconduct:

• Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of former *24 SCR 20:8.4(c) 2 by holding personal funds in his trust account in order to avoid the seizure of those funds by tax authorities.
• Depositing his own funds into his trust account, in violation of former SCR 20:1.15(b)(3). 3
• Failing to hold in trust, separate from his own property, that property of clients and third persons that were in his possession in connection with representations, in violation of former SCR 20:1.15(a) 4 *25 (effective through June 30, 2004) and former SCR 20:1.15(b)(l) 5 (effective July 1, 2004).
• Making disbursements from a trust account by a telephone transfer of funds, in violation of former SCR 20:1.15(e)(4)b. 6
• Failing to comply with record keeping requirements, in violation of former SCR 20:1.15(f)(l)a, 7 *26 20:1.15(f)(l)b, 8 20:1.15(f)(l)d 9 and 20:l.l5(fXDg. 10
*27 • Filing false certificates with the State Bar of Wisconsin in violation of former SCR 20:l.l5(i)(4). 11

¶ 7. The stipulation states that Attorney Thi-bodeau fully understands the misconduct allegations; fully understands the ramifications should the court impose the stipulated 60 day suspension of his license to practice law; and fully understands his right to contest the matter and to consult with counsel. Attorney Thi-bodeau states that he entered into the stipulation knowingly and voluntarily and that he admits the misconduct and assents to the level of discipline sought by the OLR director.

¶ 8. We approve the parties' stipulation and recommendation regarding discipline. Consistent with the stipulation we will not impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney Thibodeau.

¶ 9. IT IS ORDERED that the license of Attorney James D. Thibodeau to practice law in Wisconsin is suspended for a period of 60 days, effective October 23, 2007.

*28 ¶ 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney James D. Thibodeau shall comply with the requirements of SCR 22.26 pertaining to activities following suspension.

¶ 11. PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate.
1

SCR 22.12 provides in relevant part that "(1) The director may file with the complaint a stipulation of the director and the respondent to the facts, conclusions of law regarding misconduct, and discipline to be imposed. The supreme court may consider the complaint and stipulation without the appointment of a referee."

2

Effective July 1, 2007, substantial changes were made to the Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys, SCR Chapter 20. See Supreme Court Order No. 04-07, 2007 WT 4, 293 Wis. 2d xv; and Supreme Court Order No. 06-04, 2007 WI 48, 297 Wis. 2d xlvii. Since the conduct underlying this case arose prior to July 1, 2007, all references to the supreme court rules will be to those in effect prior to July 1,2007.

Former SCR 20:8.4(c) provided that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to "engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation."

3

Former SCR 20:1.15(b)(3) provided: "Lawyer funds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Raymond M. Clark
2016 WI 36 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2016)
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Grogan
2011 WI 7 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2011)
People v. ALSTER
221 P.3d 1088 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2009)
People v. Herrick
191 P.3d 172 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2007 WI 118, 738 N.W.2d 558, 305 Wis. 2d 21, 2007 Wisc. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-disciplinary-proceedings-against-thibodeau-wis-2007.