Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hammell

527 N.W.2d 690, 190 Wis. 2d 635, 1995 Wisc. LEXIS 22
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1995
Docket95-0420-D
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 527 N.W.2d 690 (Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hammell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hammell, 527 N.W.2d 690, 190 Wis. 2d 635, 1995 Wisc. LEXIS 22 (Wis. 1995).

Opinion

STATE OF WISCONSIN — SUPREME COURT

ORDER

The Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) filed a report on February 14, 1995 recommending that the court grant the petition of Attorney Richard J. Hammel that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be revoked by consent as discipline for professional misconduct under investiga *636 tion by the Board. That misconduct concerned Attorney Hammel's having prepared amendments to a client's trust giving him substantial bequests, the last totaling $150,000 or 30 percent of the client's estate, having his client sign checks payable to Attorney Hammel and members of his family totaling $133,600, and obtaining a $132,900 loan from his client which he documented as a purchase and for which he gave collateral of overstated value. In his petition, Attorney Hammel acknowledged that he cannot successfully defend against those allegations of professional misconduct. The Board alleged that the misconduct violated SCR 20:1.8(a) and (c) and 20:8.4(c).

Attorney Hammel was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1952 and, until his discontinuation of practice, practiced in Brookfield. He currently is ineligible to practice law, as of October 31,1994, by virtue of his suspension from membership in the State Bar for failure to pay dues.

It Is Ordered that the petition is granted and, effective the date of this order, the license of Richard J. Hammel to practice law in Wisconsin is revoked by consent, pursuant to SCR 21.10(1).

It Is Further Ordered that within 60 days of the date of this order Richard J. Hammel pay to the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility the costs of this disciplinary proceeding.

It Is Further Ordered that Richard J. Hammel comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been revoked.

Marilyn L. Graves

Clerk of Supreme Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Devaney
870 A.2d 53 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 N.W.2d 690, 190 Wis. 2d 635, 1995 Wisc. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-disciplinary-proceedings-against-hammell-wis-1995.