Matter of Didier
This text of 2022 ND 108 (Matter of Didier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MAY 26, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 108
In the Matter of Lawrence Didier Frederick Fremgen, Stutsman County State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Lawrence Didier, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20210325
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Megan B. Carmichael, Assistant State’s Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Tyler J. Morrow, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant. Matter of Didier No. 20210325
[¶1] Lawrence Didier appeals from the district court’s order denying his application for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the court’s finding that he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Under our modified clearly erroneous standard of review, clear and convincing evidence exists for the court’s finding Didier has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. The court’s finding is not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 108, 974 N.W.2d 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-didier-nd-2022.