Matter of Didier
This text of 2021 ND 13 (Matter of Didier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT FEBRUARY 3, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 13
In the Matter of Lawrence Didier
Frederick Fremgen, Stutsman County State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Lawrence Didier, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20200217
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joseph K. Nwoga, Assistant State’s Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Tyler J. Morrow, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant. Matter of Didier No. 20200217
[¶1] Lawrence Didier appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment. Didier argues the order denying his discharge from civil commitment was not supported by clear and convincing evidence he remains a sexually dangerous individual. Under our modified clearly erroneous standard of review, we conclude the district court’s findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 13, 954 N.W.2d 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-didier-nd-2021.