Matter of Dickson v. Flynn

6 N.E.2d 102, 273 N.Y. 72, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1173
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 6 N.E.2d 102 (Matter of Dickson v. Flynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Dickson v. Flynn, 6 N.E.2d 102, 273 N.Y. 72, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1173 (N.Y. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The purposes for which the Four-BoroOptical Corporation is to be organized, as set forth in its certificate of incorporation, conform with the provisions of section 1432-a of the Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16) (Roschen v. Ward, 279 U. S. 337), and the objection by appellant appearing in the affidavit of the acting chief of the Division of Corporations is not sufficient to *76 warrant refusal to file and record this certificate. We do not construe the wording of the proposed certificate of incorporation as authorizing the practice of optometry.

At this time we decide no other issue. If, in the future, questions relating to any violation of law by the corporation or by any optometrist employed by it shall arise, the courts can then deal with them.

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Loughran and Rippey, JJ., concur; Hubbs, J., dissents: Lehman and Finch, JJ., taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shane Harrold v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012
New York State Optometric Ass'n v. Whelan
54 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
New York State Optometric Ass'n v. Whelan
85 Misc. 2d 887 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Posner v. Rockefeller
31 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Sterling Optical Co. v. University of the State
55 Misc. 2d 852 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
MacK v. Saars
188 A.2d 863 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1963)
State v. Ritholz
115 N.W.2d 743 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1962)
People v. Sterling Optical Co.
26 Misc. 2d 412 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Dickstein v. Optical Service, Inc.
19 Misc. 2d 495 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Williams v. Mack
278 N.W. 585 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)
People v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.
13 N.E.2d 750 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.E.2d 102, 273 N.Y. 72, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dickson-v-flynn-ny-1937.