MATTER OF DICKMAN v. City of New York
224 N.E.2d 717, 18 N.Y.2d 969
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Nathaniel Dickman, Respondent,
v.
City of New York, Appellant, and Markhoff, Gottlieb & Harkins, Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Irving Genn of counsel), for appellant.
Abraham Markhoff for Markhoff, Gottlieb & Harkins, respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.
Determination affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF DICKMAN v. City of New York, 224 N.E.2d 717, 18 N.Y.2d 969 (N.Y. 1966).
224 N.E.2d 717 (MATTER OF DICKMAN v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Olivier v. New York State Dept. of Corr.
2025 NY Slip Op 01851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Peralta v. Supreme Ct., 1st Jud. Dept.
2025 NY Slip Op 00506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Enoch v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
2020 NY Slip Op 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of McCabe v. Albany County Sheriff's Department
129 A.D.3d 1348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Claim of Casale v. City of Rye
108 A.D.3d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric Center
699 N.E.2d 411 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
Formal Opinion No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1987
the Claim of Scandale v. New York Telephone Co.
55 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)