Matter of Devery
55 N.E.2d 370, 292 N.Y. 596, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1755, 14 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 955
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS and DESMOND, JJ. RIPPEY, CONWAY and THACHER, JJ., dissent on the ground that the question submitted to arbitration was the obligation of the employer to continue Cody as a truck driver and that it did not embrace the question whether Cody should be continued in employment in any capacity compatible with his physical condition, whereby he might earn at least a union helper's rate of pay.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Devery, 55 N.E.2d 370, 292 N.Y. 596, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1755, 14 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 955 (N.Y. 1944).
55 N.E.2d 370 (Matter of Devery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.
10 Misc. 2d 706 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In Re the Arbitration Between Ruppert & Egelhofer
148 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)