Matter of Destin B.

2018 NY Slip Op 9019
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2018
Docket7927
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 9019 (Matter of Destin B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Destin B., 2018 NY Slip Op 9019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Destin B. (2018 NY Slip Op 09019)
Matter of Destin B.
2018 NY Slip Op 09019
Decided on December 27, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 27, 2018
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Kapnick, Kahn, Singh, JJ.

7927

[*1]In re Destin B., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency


Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jonathan Popolow of counsel), for presentment agency.



Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about July 14, 2017, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's fact-finding determination was not against the

weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. Although the victim did not testify, the off-duty detective had a sufficient opportunity to observe the incident so as to establish all the elements of the offenses.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 27, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 9019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-destin-b-nyappdiv-2018.